Do you mean to imply that there is anyone in existence that Peanut can't relate to?Gamewolf67 wrote:Choose Tarot! She's a dog and you can actually relate to her!
Xane wrote:Tarot said this was about The Game but then turns it into a relationship thing. I agree with a few others that this was sparked by whatever Pete is up to. If that's true it just makes it worse to me because that means they're still using Peanut as a pawn in their stupid game.
Although I personally doubt that this is being motivated [solely] by the Game, if this is, I'm going to vastly dissapointed in Dragon...
That being said, part of me thinks that the reason they're in another dimension is so that it makes it easier for Dragon to manifest herself without Pete catching wind of it. He wanted Peanut as his Dream Sunderer because he has a lot of "imagination;" Pete could ruin everything if he knew what was going in here.
I'm going to slightly disagree on this point. Pete's a real, self-proclaimed jerk, and he goes to a lot of trouble to make sure that everybody knows it. But when his avatar in the previous game dies? He glosses over it, but you can see in his memories that he's weeping like a child (http://www.housepetscomic.com/2012/05/2 ... -lifetime/). That doesn't mean that he always cares, or that he cares for his followers as much as his avatar, but when he "seemXane wrote:I always thought the recap of the game with "off-putting figurines" was meant to show that even if the players seem to care about their avatars/followers (Pete and Joan of Arc, Dragon and Peanut), in the long run there's such a huge difference between them that in the end they're still just "toys" for the superbeings.
People can get really upset in a roleplaying game when their long-time character dies; they invest a lot in those characters. Imagine how much more difficult that would be knowing that someone actually died.
