I'ma pick this up in a PM so as not to derail the lovely conversation going on here.Adoring Fan wrote:Also, i know i have asked this several times.... Where are you guys getting those awesome banners!?
Have you been looking at the thing above this? Dis is my old signature and is not relevant anymore.Blog:
https://genstarblog.blogspot.com/
Da bad translations by Render:
http://www.housepetscomic.com/forums/vi ... 99#p772199
It could be his evil brother!Sleet wrote:Not all fat people are the same person you know.
tsMKG wrote:The Vet isn't the fat PETA guy
I don't say he is (even if i'm not very away to do it , i know) ; but he should beSleet wrote:Not all fat people are the same person you know.
I thought right, this vet isn't the best... 
Well, the owner of Bailey isn't there and probably shouldn't neither be able to get there in time, always if he can. Anyway, now King is her "owner", as legal husband. 
Maybe the one with King and Bailey is the first case of married pets, but, does this vet really know how the thing work in his universe? Apparently, no. Aww, how cute is Elaine there. 
Eh, he talks about families... Unfortunately, you two are having a different concept of family... Dear vet, if you know the story behind King, then you'll need a psychologist. 
In fact, Keene's job, which implies heavy political help, is to make sure that some rights are established, rather than letting Babylon Gardens being a walled-up oasis and ignore the rest of the big bad world. It's rather depressing, to think that 'hey, guys, just roll down, be good fuzzy things and stop believing you can be persons'.Xane wrote:Unfortunately it has been heavily implied that pets outside of places like Babylon Gardens are treated like nothing but animals. The leash laws, Joel's pets, the puppy thrown off the bridge, the kid at Bailey's place and Bailey's own attitude towards herself as nothing but property all hint that for the world at large that pets aren't treated any differently than they are in our universe.
Bad bedside manner is the vet dismissing the midwives as useless. The "pets can't speak for themselves and your owners are terrible for letting you think you can" is just being a complete jerk.
Yup, lately Rick is having problem with tags.Backlash wrote:Hang on, why doesn't Elaine have a tag on this comic?
Have you been looking at the thing above this? Dis is my old signature and is not relevant anymore.Blog:
https://genstarblog.blogspot.com/
Da bad translations by Render:
http://www.housepetscomic.com/forums/vi ... 99#p772199
Have you ever visited Cahoots?Tooths wrote:Or if they will all be in cahoots and make up a different tale.
They don't even own King legally.Frank wrote:actually that's a good question: Do the ferrets (or rather, the Milton Trust Fund) own Bailey legally?ChekeBello wrote:Well they are owned by spoiled ferrets
I can see people still searching King's first ownerArgent wrote:They don't even own King legally.
Have you been looking at the thing above this? Dis is my old signature and is not relevant anymore.Blog:
https://genstarblog.blogspot.com/
Da bad translations by Render:
http://www.housepetscomic.com/forums/vi ... 99#p772199
They doesn't risk to find him soontsMKG wrote:I can see people still searching King's first ownerArgent wrote:They don't even own King legally.
He's not evil , yes . Just a very old time jerk thinking the humans are the summit ; and pets to four , barking or meowingXane wrote:Well not evil, but his jerkitude is not offset by amusing antics like Pete, so he's just a plain old boring jerk who probably won't find much work in this town.Argent wrote:The vet isn't "evil". The vet character Samantha Walton I created in Richmond Acres is quite a bit like this. I could certainly see her having this reaction to "pet marriages".
Friend, you are aware how long I have been part of the community (but since my study took most of my time, silent). I was talking about the real world and (a bit) that comic. Just because I don't like the notion of "pets" being "equal" to humans, doesn't mean, that I dislike the whole comic. No need to get upset about that.Panther wrote: Pets holding the middle ground between animals and humans : we should to say that it's a sort of pre-anthros . And if you dislike to threat animals as peoples ; you can stop to read this comic , because i strongly doubt rick Griffin will stop to draw these "pets" just for you feel better
Yeah I actually agree with you sort of. I don't think that the pets should be treated as non-men, but I don't like it when the comic dwells upon their social status.Jakkal wrote:Friend, you are aware how long I have been part of the community (but since my study took most of my time, silent). I was talking about the real world and (a bit) that comic. Just because I don't like the notion of "pets" being "equal" to humans, doesn't mean, that I dislike the whole comic. No need to get upset about that.Panther wrote: Pets holding the middle ground between animals and humans : we should to say that it's a sort of pre-anthros . And if you dislike to threat animals as peoples ; you can stop to read this comic , because i strongly doubt rick Griffin will stop to draw these "pets" just for you feel better
Read well my words : i haven't said you dislike the comic , but to threat animals as peoplesJakkal wrote:Friend, you are aware how long I have been part of the community (but since my study took most of my time, silent). I was talking about the real world and (a bit) that comic. Just because I don't like the notion of "pets" being "equal" to humans, doesn't mean, that I dislike the whole comic. No need to get upset about that.Panther wrote: Pets holding the middle ground between animals and humans : we should to say that it's a sort of pre-anthros . And if you dislike to threat animals as peoples ; you can stop to read this comic , because i strongly doubt rick Griffin will stop to draw these "pets" just for you feel better
Like Raditz once said, "aww, look, he thinks he's people."Wolfbane wrote:Knowing King, if Bailey doesn't flip out on this vet at some point he'll probably beat her to it.
It's really weird having these kinds of rights issues finally being brought to the forefront when one of the affected were once actually human.
