2016/01/13 - The Third Comic With Ninjas, Probably

For old comic discussions threads! seriously what did you think
User avatar
RandomGeekNamedBrent
laughing maniacally
Posts: 21032
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm
Location: an invisible, flying volcano over Virginia

Re: 2016/01/13 - The Third Comic With Ninjas, Probably

Post by RandomGeekNamedBrent »

the comics code wass basically like a rating system for comics. publishers sent their comics to the Comics Code Authority, and if they followed the right rules they'd get a seal of approval and parents and advertisers could know what they were buying/supporting without having to read the whole comic.
Paradigm Shift by me
I do not actually believe any of what I'm saying.
RP character sheets
User avatar
Argent
Posts: 5972
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: Noonkkot <32,64,51>
Contact:

Re: 2016/01/13 - The Third Comic With Ninjas, Probably

Post by Argent »

Basically, there were a lot of "detective" comics that had a lot of explicit violence and nudity and there was a huge push-back against "cartoon violence". They were talking about having regulations and so the comics industry set up a "comics code" that banned anything considered dodgy in mid-20th-century America.

Meanwhile it was still perfectly OK for Bugs to dress up as a girl and marry Elmer, and Jerry cutting Tom into slices didn't raise an eyebrow.
Cinnamon "Sixtoes" Walton (M Pine Marten #B06060) @
Pitchpipe (F Jackrabbit #808060) @
User avatar
Unusuallynamedperson
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 7:24 pm
Location: Well, even I don't know that one.
Contact:

Re: 2016/01/13 - The Third Comic With Ninjas, Probably

Post by Unusuallynamedperson »

Argent wrote:Basically, there were a lot of "detective" comics that had a lot of explicit violence and nudity and there was a huge push-back against "cartoon violence". They were talking about having regulations and so the comics industry set up a "comics code" that banned anything considered dodgy in mid-20th-century America.

Meanwhile it was still perfectly OK for Bugs to dress up as a girl and marry Elmer, and Jerry cutting Tom into slices didn't raise an eyebrow.
Okay, this conversation is getting weird. :lol:
Besides that level of violence was nowhere near what it is at today, and still their haven't really been any societal issues from it. At least I don't think so, but I could be wrong.
If I hit someone with a dictionary is that physical, or verbal assault?
Image
https://discord.gg/2Kwwv Housepets Discord link repaired!
User avatar
Welsh Halfwit
Posts: 14141
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:09 am
Location: Wales, a luverrly land with noisy neighbours.

Re: 2016/01/13 - The Third Comic With Ninjas, Probably

Post by Welsh Halfwit »

Amazee Dayzee wrote:OK I'm confused and I don't really read a lot of comics. What is the comic code?
It was, basically, censorship. The government wanted comics controlled and, if the publishers didn't do it, the government would. So the COMICS CODE AUTHORITY (CCA) was set up. The publishers sent their comics in and they were judged on art, violence, morals and other watchwords of the day. If they passed, the comic got a little badge for the cover telling everyone (parents) that it was safe for others (children) to read. Marvel dumped it in the 2000's and, by 2010, is was obsolete as no-one was using it.
Commander Hawle. U.S.C. Loper. By the talented DDeer.
Kilo - 2-8-3-9-10-2-5
Kilo
Leslie – 4-6-4-5-6-9-7
Leslie
David Campbell - 7 – 8 – 9 – 5 – 4 – 4 – 6
Corp Davidstow 6 - 6 - 7 - 3 - 6 - 6 - 5 (reactions 7 Combat 9)
User avatar
Amazee Dayzee
Posts: 25977
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:24 pm

Re: 2016/01/13 - The Third Comic With Ninjas, Probably

Post by Amazee Dayzee »

I'm assuming that this was around the time that there was a censorship on movies also?
Post Reply