Page 1 of 2

Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:23 am
by RockstarRaccoon
I said this in the Current Comic discussion, and I decided to make it into a thread.
RockstarRaccoon wrote:I can't wait to see what Pete does.
Finally, it looks like we get to see what his intentions are, and why Tarot was so afraid of him.

Edit: I looked back just now, because of all the debate, and I noticed that the full description she gave was (transcribed verbatim)
The power Grape knows as 'Pete' has transmitted a dream to her in order to put her at ease, thinking that his freedom is what she wants
Don't believe it! Pete is neither kind nor good; He is actually sort of a jerk.
Hurry, Peanut! Stop Grape or we're all in grave peril!
Hugs and Kisses, Honey
Then of course, Peanut isn't too bright, so Zack presses the button and releases Pete, after which he has this dramatic entrance where he breaks out of the cave and terrifies everyone who sees him. (they all seem to forget it) Obviously, be it true or not, something has lead Tarot to believe that Pete is not kind or good, or at least, that she should tell people this. Has anyone thought of the possibility that Pete is good and what Tarot is saying isn't true, whether she knows it or not? I'm going to assume that Tarot is not evil, because of the way she's been portrayed, but she's also a strange character who gets most of her info from otherworldly beings, but that doesn't mean she won't lie to further a greater agenda. (I hope I didn't just screw up an entire mega-arc for Rick. Sorry if I did!)

Now, to give an opinion of Pete's actions toward Joel/King, he seems to feel that what he is doing is righteous, despite how little he thinks of Joel/King's desires, or even his rights as a living creature. He seems to think that this is ok, and I'm still divided on this: Joel was a bad person, whether he was bad-hearted or not, and now King is, in fact, learning his lesson.
Now, I'm not usually into over-analysis like this, but I just thought this was interesting.

So: Could Pete be Good and Tarot be not telling the truth? I'm not saying Tarot is Evil, because, as I said, she's been portrayed in a way that makes this seem impossible from a story-perspective, but she may be working on the side of evil unwittingly. We don't know who Tarot gets her info from, or what their intentions really are, only that she refers to them as "the spirits": she may even be working for Pete himself, who knew she couldn't stop him, and wanted her to create opposition for some complicated reason. (this is a stretch though) Maybe she knows this to be a lie, and is telling it because she thinks good will come of it.
In any case, Pete has not shown himself to be "evil", though he does seem to be a Jerk, from the way he treats King. However: realize that, in locking King in a cage, he is protecting him from whatever his plans are.

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:29 am
by ChewyChewy
Just one: the MST3K mantra. :P

Seriously, though, while that's an interesting take, I doubt that it's going to get that complicated in this webcomic. It's called Housepets! and the primary focus is on house pets. Even though the multi-part "conspiracy theory" is fun to think about, I really have my doubts as to whether anything like that will happen. This is not a progressive narrative-based webcomic (like, say, Slightly D***ed), it's an episodic funny comic. And while it's good to see something in the way of progression, like development of the characters and their relationships, I don't think the focus would shift THAT much in a comic with this tone and scope.

In sum, good fanfic fodder, probably not going to see it in the comic itself.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:54 am
by RockstarRaccoon
I wouldn't call this complicated, it just looks that way because I presented it so thuroughly. What it would essentially be is a situation where the characters were being fooled all along. That's not complicated, that's just a huge twist, which is good story-material.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:23 am
by ChewyChewy
RockstarRaccoon wrote:I wouldn't call this complicated, it just looks that way because I presented it so thuroughly. What it would essentially be is a situation where the characters were being fooled all along. That's not complicated, that's just a huge twist, which is good story-material.
In a generic sense, yes--kind of like when Sasha said what she did at the end of "The Present."

But this is going way beyond the basic premise of the comic, so I'm less confident of such.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:52 am
by yoyodude
b-b-b-but Tarot is too cute to be evil! :D

I agree with ChewyChewy in that this would make the whole comic way too complex if it actually occured. Also, a crazy big plot like this would seem to hijack the comic sorta. In the beginning we had pets "imaginating" and worrying about the vet, going to the zoo and seeing Uncle Ruben. If the whole comic turns into an epic battle between good and evil (though it almost kinda is) it would take away from the original theme for the comic

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:32 am
by IceKitsune
You know I had this thought as well,that the spirits might be tricking Tarot,but I think that might be a little to cliche. Its not even that's its to complicated its that it would be more obvious of a twist then Fido secretly being a Cat Lover (I mean come on the second they mentioned Fido I knew where that was going). And about this comic being to funny/episodic for something like this well to tell you the truth I'm waiting to see when/if this comic goes into Cerebus Syndrome territory really. (I'm not saying it will go that deep in to it obviously-in fact I have a feeling it will more or less straddle the line-and I admit it might not at all but I could see it getting a little more serious as the plots drag on.)

Edit: worded it a bit better

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:27 pm
by Typhon
but, but she's a Pomeranian!

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:32 pm
by 44R0NM10
I don't think Tarot can be evil. She doesn't smile much though (have a look). Could she be hiding something (dun, dun, duuuuun!)?

Also, I don't think Pete has ever been called evil by the comic. Sure he's a jerk, but all we know is 'he's the beginning of the end' (link).

I don't think it's be too complicated to have Pete being nice...but I don't think Tarot can be evil. If a character can joke, he/she's not evil in my book...unless he/she is clearly evil, like Zed from power rangers.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:00 pm
by Typhon
Maybe it's her eyes..those scary eyes that look into your soul..

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:18 pm
by Turnsky
i personally think that Pete's no more malicious than a force of nature.

Neither good or evil, He just is.

Maybe he's the embodiment of Karma.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:16 pm
by yoyodude
Turnsky wrote: Maybe he's the embodiment of Karma.
Hmmmmmmmm...

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:49 pm
by IceKitsune
Turnsky wrote:Maybe he's the embodiment of Karma.
You know I always assumed he was some sort of actual God of some sort (Possibly Marduk (or some Babylonian God) due to the Akkadian Language on his prison.) But this is also a major possibility him just being some sort of embodiment of something. But then again it is equally as possible he's some sort of other God from another Pantheon (like Loki or someone) or even just something that Rick made up that has no connection to anything.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:25 am
by Liam
IceKitsune wrote:
Turnsky wrote:Maybe he's the embodiment of Karma.
You know I always assumed he was some sort of actual God of some sort (Possibly Marduk (or some Babylonian God) due to the Akkadian Language on his prison.)
The Akkadian language could indicate he's the 5th century BC Persian version of a griffin, what has interesting implications since they considered him a protector from evil and witchcraft.

So, maybe they're both on the side of good (betterment of the neighborhood?), but Pete despises her for her "soft" handling of things, where he's more of a "Utopia justifies the means" guy. Or so.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:30 pm
by Dr. Prower
Typhon wrote:Maybe it's her eyes..those scary eyes that look into your soul..
Her eyes are cute...until they start glowing.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:31 pm
by Dissension
At that point, Tarot's eyes become super-cute.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:17 am
by Typhon
At that point, Tarot's eyes become super-cute creepy

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:58 pm
by RockstarRaccoon
lol, this isn't about Tarot's eyes, this is about a theoretical plot twist! XD

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:08 am
by Ebly
Well I dunno, I see Pete as being Pete. Not some weird mystical theory, just another character in the scheme of things.

Following the whole karma thing, though the idea of karma is based in the sum of a person's past actions dictating the results of their future endeavors, it's generally seen as being a form of just desserts - essentially a fair ending to an unresolved situation. That would explain the whole beginning of the end thing, especially since it's not really supposed to be immediate.

Either way the whole thing's begging a level of philosophy and spirituality that seems kind of wacky and out-of-place on a wacky and out-of-place forum like this

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:26 am
by Typhon
Ebly wrote:Well I dunno, I see Pete as being Pete. Not some weird mystical theory, just another character in the scheme of things.

Following the whole karma thing, though the idea of karma is based in the sum of a person's past actions dictating the results of their future endeavors, it's generally seen as being a form of just desserts - essentially a fair ending to an unresolved situation. That would explain the whole beginning of the end thing, especially since it's not really supposed to be immediate.

Either way the whole thing's begging a level of philosophy and spirituality that seems kind of wacky and out-of-place on a wacky and out-of-place forum like this
some people believe that being born a man is karma for doing a good job as a wife in the past life. Karma can work in mysterious ways...

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:30 am
by Ebly
Typhon wrote:some people believe that being born a man is karma for doing a good job as a wife in the past life
these are people that believe men are more powerful than women... and isn't really appropriate.

this has nothing to do with pete

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:14 am
by RockstarRaccoon
Ebly wrote:Either way the whole thing's begging a level of philosophy and spirituality that seems kind of wacky and out-of-place on a wacky and out-of-place forum like this
It's also kind of unrelated to what I started with... All I said was that there is a possibility that Rick's been feeding us faulty information about Pete, through Tarot. I think the term is a "Red Herring", where the author intentionally misleads the reader.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:11 pm
by Macsen

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:54 pm
by yoyodude
Yeah why would Tarot say to stop worrying about the "beginning of the end"? Seems sorta sketch...

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:58 pm
by IceKitsune
yoyodude wrote:
Yeah why would Tarot say to stop worrying about the "beginning of the end"? Seems sorta sketch...
Most likely because Pete is a God and there is nothing they could do about him anyway. That makes me think exactly how are they going to deal with Pete anyway even though he has limits on his powers they most likely aren't enough to allow any of them to stop him from doing whatever he wants.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:13 am
by Typhon
IceKitsune wrote:
yoyodude wrote:
Yeah why would Tarot say to stop worrying about the "beginning of the end"? Seems sorta sketch...
Most likely because Pete is a God and there is nothing they could do about him anyway. That makes me think exactly how are they going to deal with Pete anyway even though he has limits on his powers they most likely aren't enough to allow any of them to stop him from doing whatever he wants.
They got two options, steal Pandora's box and gain the power to kill a god, or sit back and let things play out. I think we know which path they'll take.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:36 pm
by Macsen
yoyodude wrote:
Yeah why would Tarot say to stop worrying about the "beginning of the end"? Seems sorta sketch...
She could've overestimated the threat at first. Pete was sealed up before. Now that he's out, certainly Tarot can read him better, and also he'd be aware of her if he's as powerful as she claimed.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:35 pm
by RockstarRaccoon
IceKitsune wrote:Most likely because Pete is a God and there is nothing they could do about him anyway. That makes me think exactly how are they going to deal with Pete anyway even though he has limits on his powers they most likely aren't enough to allow any of them to stop him from doing whatever he wants.
My opinion is corrupted by Skrawl, where gods ONLY have the powers people give him, but maybe he's actually incapable of doing alot of things on his own. Maybe all he can do is be a meddlesome trickster or whatever until someone enables him to destroy civilization as we know it or whatever. Anyway, that's me getting off topic.
This backs up my theory that more is in play than Tarot has revealed. Obviously she felt that telling Peanut to stop Grape was what she needed to do at the time. Now she feels that it's more important to not have them worrying about it.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:10 pm
by mathgrant
yoyodude wrote:b-b-b-but Tarot is too cute to be evil! :D

I agree with ChewyChewy in that this would make the whole comic way too complex if it actually occured. Also, a crazy big plot like this would seem to hijack the comic sorta. In the beginning we had pets "imaginating" and worrying about the vet, going to the zoo and seeing Uncle Ruben. If the whole comic turns into an epic battle between good and evil (though it almost kinda is) it would take away from the original theme for the comic
I was wondering how to properly describe how different the comic feels now, as opposed to before the "It's a Wonderful Dog's Life" arc, and you seem to have hit the nail on the head, yoyodude. The comic is still episodic and still has punchlines and humor at mostly regular intervals, and the one-offs and arcs like "The Present" keep the comic from becoming too serious, Joel being turned into King seems to be of a much different nature from the earlier arcs about going to the zoo or the vet, or even Fido returning. But what do I know? I'm just an old fogey. :P

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:40 pm
by RockstarRaccoon
mathgrant wrote:I was wondering how to properly describe how different the comic feels now, as opposed to before the "It's a Wonderful Dog's Life" arc, and you seem to have hit the nail on the head, yoyodude. The comic is still episodic and still has punchlines and humor at mostly regular intervals, and the one-offs and arcs like "The Present" keep the comic from becoming too serious, Joel being turned into King seems to be of a much different nature from the earlier arcs about going to the zoo or the vet, or even Fido returning. But what do I know? I'm just an old fogey. :P
I would say that too. I think it's him attempting to throw some serious thriller-type stuff into the comic. He tried it with the Sinister Shadow arc, and then tried it again with more of a fantasy aspect with Pete. It's a good way to do a story, I think: he keeps it entertaining. It's not nonstop happy rainbows and all that, yet you can still take it lightly.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:31 am
by Typhon
That was such a underhanded move by tarot telling King's true nature to his face now lol. She has a jerk side too.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:24 am
by Macsen
If Tarot is evil, then so is Sabrina, since she's in league with her.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:24 am
by Dr. Prower
Come to the Jerk side.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:48 am
by Kyderra
Kitch wrote:If Tarot is evil, then so is Sabrina, since she's in league with her.
well she did turn the most well respected top dog into a cat lover.

map your minds around this one:
Image

Did Tarot tell her it would be okey to meet there?
And if so, did she know Peanut and Grape would be there?
Did that lead to the current events?
Or has Kyderra finally snapped.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:58 am
by Sinder
poor fido's crooked little smile gets me every time

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:59 am
by Tiggy
Yup, he's lost it. Take 'im away boys! To the looney-house!

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:02 am
by Macsen
I think you've snapped. But the coloring job is good. :P

I think you missed a spot in panel 4, though.

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:44 pm
by JOFOXX
Liam wrote:
IceKitsune wrote:
Turnsky wrote:Maybe he's the embodiment of Karma.
You know I always assumed he was some sort of actual God of some sort (Possibly Marduk (or some Babylonian God) due to the Akkadian Language on his prison.)
The Akkadian language could indicate he's the 5th century BC Persian version of a griffin, what has interesting implications since they considered him a protector from evil and witchcraft.

So, maybe they're both on the side of good (betterment of the neighborhood?), but Pete despises her for her "soft" handling of things, where he's more of a "Utopia justifies the means" guy. Or so.
This sounds like a good theory. Pete hasn't done anything "evil", and I find it hard to look at Tarot as being "evil". It's very possible that they just have different perspectives on the same "good".

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:23 pm
by RockstarRaccoon
Well, despite the title, I kinda said Tarot doesn't have to be evil. What I'm saying is that it's entirely possible that Tarot isn't giving everything away, or that the spirits aren't telling her everything. I have a feeling that if the former is true, we may hear it when Tarot is talking to King in this arc...
Sinder wrote:poor fido's crooked little smile gets me every time
There's no way he can resist her evil mind control powers! lol

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:11 pm
by IceKitsune
I've always wondered since Tarot has powers does Sabrina have any as well? (if she does I always thought they might be some sort of empathy type powers) And for that matter are Tarots powers inborn or do they come completely from the Spirits?

Re: Pete = Good, Tarot = Evil?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:30 pm
by Sinder
sabrina can kill people with her mind

it just hasn't come up yet