Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
-
PhoenixAsper
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:38 am
Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
I know that some people here think as such. What's your personal take on the alt text of the various comics? While they are unquestionably funny, are they to be taken as true? I regard nearly all them them as partially canon at least, what about you?
-
Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
I assume them to be canon unless non-alt text contradicts them or they're clearly direct shout-outs.
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
As long as their facts don't explicitly show up in the actual comic I would say they're non-canonical since they're used primarily for jokes anyway.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
Wanderer wrote:You don't need a job, you need money.
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
the jacked are not tickets now?
"Why would you ever want to connect the dots?"
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
No, but I'm sitting on a horse.Kyderra wrote:the jacked are not tickets now?
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
Wanderer wrote:You don't need a job, you need money.
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
and it is amazing might I sayLiam wrote:No, but I'm sitting on a horse.Kyderra wrote:the jacked are not tickets now?
"Why would you ever want to connect the dots?"
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
I believe it is just a 'extra joke or a stupid thought', probably non-cannon.
Make Pasta not war.
Re: Alt-Text = Non-Canon?
Alt-text is definitely meant to be an extra joke, but I also find it to be a perfectly logical explanation/response. So I guess I assume it as canon until being told otherwise.