Friendcodes Pokemon

Jakkal · Post by **Jakkal** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:26 am

Since I heared some of you guys are Pokemon player, I want you to post your Friendcode, so others can add you to have fun even on a DS, not just HP

My Friendcode is: 0560 9857 8266

Version: Heart Gold

Added this far: none

please post them, so I can send you some "german speaking" Pokemons

Teh Brawler · Post by **Teh Brawler** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:41 pm

Oh I haven't played HeartGold in so long.

I'll get back to you on that, my DS is dead, and I left my charger at home.

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:45 pm

;_; For some reason I no longer have WiFi. So I won't be able to do it.

Sorry Jakkal.

Alex · Post by **Alex** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:10 pm

I wish I could play, but I don't have a DS. HeartGold looks so neat, though.

Dubiousity · Post by **Dubiousity** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:26 pm

I would gladly trounce you, if my game didn't break a month ago.

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:37 pm

This thread has become (Excuses for not giving Friendcodes Pokemon). We all have our separate reasons. Again, I am very sorry Jakkal, I wish I could, but apparently we no longer have WiFi, least I think not. If you want however, I can still do other games such as SSBB and Mario Kart Wii if you wish it.

Post by **Sleet** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:21 pm

A big issue I have with Pokémon is that "you play Pokémon? Cool, me too! Let's battle!" doesn't work 90% of the time because of level differences. There needs to be a level-balancing option in Black and White. Even better, there could be a handicapping option to raise or lower one player's Pokémon's levels, a stat balancing option (an Arceus would be about 1/4 the level of a Sunkern), or the chance to do both. That's wishful thinking, though.

I have a level 75-ish team, a level 100 team, and a level 60-ish (I think) team, if those are balanced with any teams you have. I'm not sure I can get Wi-Fi working, but it might be worth a shot sometime.

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:08 am

The problem with pokemon these days is why would anyone pick Squirtle, a small little turtle, when they can basically pick from 10 "god" pokemon. Like, really -_-

Teh Brawler · Post by **Teh Brawler** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:10 am

Typhon wrote:The problem with pokemon these days is why would anyone pick Squirtle, a small little turtle, when they can basically pick from 10 "god" pokemon. Like, really -_-

Wait what

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:12 am

He's bothered by the large quantity of superpowered legendary Pokémon. It's not really any different than everyone using Mewtwo and Mew back in the day. There's just more to choose from now.

I won't use anything in the highest tier anyway. It's called honor!

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:13 am

I did a quick google and there are 37 "legendary" Pokemon. So if you mate them all together....

Teh Brawler · Post by **Teh Brawler** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:16 am

Typhon wrote:I did a quick google and there are 37 "legendary" Pokemon. So if you mate them all together....

You get the Legendary Pokemon for the next generation. :3

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:19 am

D: one of the pokemon that can be captured created the pokemon universe!

How OP is that?!

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:21 am

Legendary Pokémon can't mate, so that won't work. Also, the only legendary Pokémon that I consider off-limits are Mewtwo, Mew, Lugia, Ho-oh, Latias, Latios, Groudon, Kyogre, Rayquaza, Jirachi, Deoxys, Dialga, Palkia, Giratina, Cresselia, Darkrai, Shaymin and Arceus.

Most of the rest aren't really any stronger than, say, a Dragonite.

Jakkal · Post by **Jakkal** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:55 am

ehh I am not the Friendcode battler... I just wanted to exchance some pkm which I "havent seen" in my game, but I know which I need... sadly, none of you is interested/got a functional version

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:12 am

I'm sorry Jakkal, I don't really have any Pokemon past the 3rd generation anyways since it won't let you catch them in the game. And the only 2 powerful pokemon I have is a Faraligator Lvl 74 and a Furret Lvl 72.

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:25 am

Tell me it's named Rick. Please.

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:36 pm

I am sorry to announce that it is not. My brother would have killed me if it was.

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:55 pm

Why's that? Don't tell me he's one of those losers who doesn't like naming Pokémon.

Or is he just also named Rick?

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:59 pm

No no, he just hates my addiction to Housepets.

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:12 pm

What a pud.

Senator_Sunburst · Post by **Senator_Sunburst** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:18 pm

Sleet wrote:Why's that? Don't tell me he's one of those losers who doesn't like naming Pokémon.

Wut? I'm one of those "losers" who doesn't like naming Pokemon.

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:25 pm

Sleet wrote:What a pud.

Just to state, I am not against him on that. Because I am on here, I don't play with him as often as I used to.

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:40 pm

You can name pokemon? I never knew that....

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:58 pm

Yeah, right after you catch them. It asks you every time if you want to give it a nickname.

When I was a kit I would always refuse to nickname them. I don't see why. Now I refuse to not nickname them.

Teh Brawler · Post by **Teh Brawler** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:05 pm

Senator_Sunburst wrote:
Sleet wrote:Why's that? Don't tell me he's one of those losers who doesn't like naming Pokémon.
Wut? I'm one of those "losers" who doesn't like naming Pokemon.

Seconded.

Post by **Sleet** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:27 pm

Whatever you say, HUMAN.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:16 pm

Teh Brawler wrote:
Senator_Sunburst wrote:
Sleet wrote:Why's that? Don't tell me he's one of those losers who doesn't like naming Pokémon.
Wut? I'm one of those "losers" who doesn't like naming Pokemon.
Seconded.

....Third-ed? XD

(I can say I'm the only one out of all my friends that doesn't nickname their pokemon. Imagine the confusion this causes me, since I'm not used to it. XD)

Ohh, no Friend Code for me. I have neither high speed nor the equipment to hook up my DS to laptop anyways.

Kaido · Post by **Kaido** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:34 pm

I name my Pokémon too. 8D

I'ma get my code when I happen to go on my DS.

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:03 am

i want a 3d ds it looks so cool

Post by **Sleet** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:05 am

Typhon wrote:i want a 3d ds it looks so cool

It does, but sadly Pokémon Black and White are only coming out on the regular DS.

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:07 am

Im still wondering how nintendo did it...3d without glasses :O on a hand held too

Senator_Sunburst · Post by **Senator_Sunburst** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:55 am

Typhon wrote:Im still wondering how nintendo did it...3d without glasses :O on a hand held too

Because they're Nintendo.

If only Sega was still making consoles. We'd probably have virtual reality games by now.

Post by **Sleet** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:20 am

Nintendo already did that.

...And it was terrible, but they did it nonetheless.

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:25 am

The Virtual Boy.

Guarantees to make you go blind or your money back.

Post by **Sleet** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:31 am

Pokémon relevant:

They're making a Yorkie Pokémon! Eeeeee! Yorterri!

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:45 am

Pokémon relevant as well:

They're making a Flying Squirrel Pokemon! Eeeeee! Emonga!

Post by **Sleet** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:07 am

If that's not an evolution of Pachirisu, those guys have no shame. If it is, awesome. Such a cute-but-weak Pokémon needed an evolution. Maybe this thing will be strong, too. I love it when strong Pokémon are still cute.

FlintTheSquirrel · Post by **FlintTheSquirrel** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:11 am

I actually want them to be separate and weak. Pokémon is way more fun when you fight with weak pokemon. It adds a challenge to the game. Furret was normal type, which generally meant he was weak. But it was very fun having him.

Typhon · Post by **Typhon** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:20 pm

Sleet wrote:Pokémon relevant:

They're making a Yorkie Pokémon! Eeeeee! Yorterri!

Am i the only one who finds this pokemon......well......ugly?