Answer the question with a question game!

Kyuunado · Post by **Kyuunado** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:32 pm

24 carrot gold did I hear?

Crystalwind · Post by **Crystalwind** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:37 pm

...What are you talking about?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:46 pm

yah , how can you smoke gold ?

Kyuunado · Post by **Kyuunado** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:01 pm

Easy, be a Kitsune. Problem with that answer anyone?

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:02 pm

Well, how can a Kitsune smoke gold?

RioluNation · Post by **RioluNation** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:48 pm

Isn't smoking bad?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 6:29 pm

Are we forgetting the forum rules?

What's wrong with my theory of randomosity? Isn't it by definition, self-proving?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 6:31 pm

Hlaoroo wrote:Have you not heard of the Hlaoroo Principle of Randomosity whereby the most random answer immediately becomes the most obvious, correct and logical answer by default?

b-but if it's random then how it can automatically be correct if it's random ? isn't random mean it has 50/50 chance ?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 6:56 pm

Doesn't random mean all possibilities have an equal chance?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:07 pm

yes , that's why it's as much of a chance that it will be right as it will be wrong.....wait , you mean you're also counting the possibility of it being 100% right ?(I'm gonna stop there because no way I'm gonna fall to your evil plan again little wabbit

)

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:15 pm

Surely the probability of any particular answer being the correct one must be 1/infinity since there are an infinite number of possible responses to any question? So surely even to say the least probable answer would be a fallacy? Does this mean I just broke my theory?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Mon Jun 03, 2013 11:44 pm

Hlaoroo wrote:Doesn't random mean all possibilities have an equal chance?

Wouldn't that also mean the that the probability of the probability to be unequal is equally likely as the probability of having equal probabilities?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:00 am

whyyyyy gecko whyyyyy ! I was trying desperately to avoid saying that , whyyyyyyyy ?!?!?!?1

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:04 am

Wouldn't making that contradiction disprove everything Hlaoroo said? Thus, there is only 1 Hlaoroo.

Kyuunado · Post by **Kyuunado** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:14 am

Ha, still a stupidly high number of us via legitimate cloning. Score: Kitsunes 1, rabbit(s) 0 I think?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:15 am

oh dog....my head....why are you guys doing this to me ? Y_Y''

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:19 am

Would considering the notion on whether Hlaoroo really exists or is just a product of the interactions in this universe help reduce your headache?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:22 am

b-but if Hlaoroo's just a production of interactions......wouldn't that make the rest of us suddenly gone crazy and talking with an imaginary friend ?

Kyuunado · Post by **Kyuunado** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:26 am

Shinobi tactical knowledge 2, Genjutsu. Either Hlaoroo is a ninja or he had help from Pete at the cost of his mortal soul. Who else thinks the latter?

Post by **Serence Frostbite** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:29 am

as hilarious as the latter sound , what would Pete do with the soul of a rabbit anyway ? .......

he's Pete eventual avatar ?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:37 am

Doesn't disporoving my randomosity theory only disproves that eternal slumber =/= light doze.
Surely it doesn't affect my army?
And wouldn't Pete would use my sole to give him good luck? Isn't that what rabbit soles are for?
And if I'm a figment of your imagination can you please imagine me as having passed my exams already?

Kyuunado · Post by **Kyuunado** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:42 am

1: No, you claimed the randomosity thing was how you had clones everywhere.
2: That's rabbit feet, he wants to turn you into a mindless cat/dog servant.
3: no, live your exams. Suffer with me

And so the answer IS your Pete's servant?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:51 am

1.) Did you read back through the posts? Didn't I only claim it was to do with the difference between snooze and slumber and not to do with, other than being named after me?
2.)Did you just miss that terrible pun or did you choose to ignore it?
3.)Pretty please?

Does it still seem like I'm Pete's avatar?
Also, if I'm a figment of your imagination surely that means physics don't apply to me since anything can happen in one's imagination?

Kyuunado · Post by **Kyuunado** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:06 am

I chose to ignore your terrible, terrible pun. Also you will end up like a worst-case scenario King. And no, Suffer!

And no, even if something is in a dream or a figment of the imagination life can be breathed into it, hence the creation of the first kitsunes and Tanukis. I can create things just by thinking about them if you recall?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:13 am

Isn't everything we see just a product of our mind accepting information from the outside world? That what we really feel, see, smell, hear, taste just a recreation of all of those inputs?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:28 am

So are you saying the whole world doesn't exist?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:33 am

That the world is just an illusion, what you experience could be real or even a simulation. It is kinda mind-blowing, right?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:55 am

The Matrix is real???????

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:03 am

Given a "perfect simulation" nobody would know that they are in a simulation, right?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:23 am

What if they're using reverse psychology by making known that the simulation exists to make people disbelieve that it really exists?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:26 am

It still shouldn't remove the probability of everything being a simulation, right?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:19 am

On the contrary, shouldn't it increase it?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:23 am

Wouldn't that just form a tautology? Not just increase the probability?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:27 am

Why should it?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:29 am

How could they use reverse psychology without actually being present? By being present, wouldn't asking whether the simulation is true or not pointless?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:51 am

Surely they don't need to be present in order to manipulate the simulation? Couldn't they do it remotely, given that they have the sophistication to set it up? And couldn't they work from within to nudge things in their desired direction?
And who ARE they anyway?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:57 am

Wouldn't it be impossible to learn who they are given a perfect simulation? It would probably be best to look for a glitch, right?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:00 am

Possibly.
Do you think it would be easier to hunt for one if I could stay alive for more than 5 minutes at a time?

GeckoZY · Post by **GeckoZY** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:04 am

Are you asking for a ceasefire?

Post by **Hlaoroo** » Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:17 am

What gave you that idea? Couldn't I have been suggesting that I need to work faster?